Use of dual mobility acetabular cups for isolated femoral revision of metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty using larger femoral heads.

Main Article Content

Sebastián Enrique Valdez

Abstract

Large head metal on metal hip arthroplasty revision has a significant complication rate, mainly related to the removal of the acetabular component, as well as to the friction pair used. In some cases, an isolated femoral revision can be made, sparing the acetabular cup and, thus, decreasing surgical morbidity.This paper discusses a case successfully treated with a dual mobility acetabular cup in a patient with a resurfacing hip replacement and a pseudotumor that caused pain and instability.Mastering this surgical approach allows hip surgeons to solve complex problems in a simple and safe manner, and with a low complication rate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Valdez, S. E. (2019). Use of dual mobility acetabular cups for isolated femoral revision of metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty using larger femoral heads. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 84(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2019.84.1.741
Section
Case Presentations
Author Biography

Sebastián Enrique Valdez, Clínica 25 de Mayo, Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Cirujano de cadera y rodilla.Residencia HIGA Dr Oscar Allende, mar del Plata2003/7Fellow cirugia de cadera y rodilla, Institut Calot , Francia. 2007/8

References

1. Snir N, Park BK, Garofalo G, Marwin SE. Revision of failed hip resurfacing and large metal no metal total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility components. Orthopedics 2015;38(6):369-74.
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20150603-04

2. Grammatoupolos G, Pandit H, Kwon YM. Hip resurfacing revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcame. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91(8):1019-24. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B8.22562

3. Browne JA, Bechtold CD, Berry DJ, Hanssen AD, Lewanllen DG. Failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a spectrum of clinical presentations and operative findings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468(9):2313-20. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1419-0

4. Su EP, Su SL. Surface replacement conversion: results depend upon reason for revision. Bone Joint J 2013;95(11 Suppl A):88-91. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32663

5. Matharu GS, Pynsent PB, Dunlop DJ. Revision of metal and metal hip replacements and resurfacings for adverse reaction to metal debris: a systematic review of outcomes. Hip Int 2014;24:311-320. DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000140

6. Combes A, Migaud H, Girard J, Duhamel A, Fessy MH. Low rate of dislocation of dual mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471(12):3891-900. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2929-3

7. Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillte C, Bejui-Hegues J. Use a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467(2):465-72. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0476-0

8. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. National Joint Registry for England and Wales 8th Annual Report 2011. Hertforshire, United Kingdom: National Joint Registry for England and Wales; 2011. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/portals/0/documents/njr%208th%20annual%20report%202011.pdf

9. Haddad FS, Thakrar RR, Hart AJ. Metal on metal bearings: the evidence so far. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93:572-79.
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.26429

10. De Smet KA, Van Der Straeten C, Van Orsouw M, Doubi R, Backers K, Grammatopoulus G. Revisions of metal on metal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome. Orthop Clin North Am 2011;42(2):259-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2011.01.003

11. Rajpura A, Porter ML, Gambhir AK, Freemont AJ, Board TN. Clinical experience of revisions of metal on metal hip arthroplasty for aseptic lymphocyte dominated vasculitis associated lesions (ALVAL). Hip Int 2011;21:43-51. DOI: 10.5301/HIP.2011.6276

12. Pritchett JW. Once component revision of failed hip resurfacing from adverse reaction to metal wear debris. J Arthroplasty 2014;29:219-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.011

13. Verhelst LA, Van der Bracht H, Vanhegan IS, Van Backlé B, De Schepper J. Revising the well fixed, painful resurfacing using a double mobility head: a new strategy to address metal on metal complications. J Arthroplasty 2012;27(10):1857-62.
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.05.012

14. Plummer DR, Botero HG, Berend KR. Salvage of monoblock metal on metal acetabular components using a dual mobility bearing. J Arthroplasty 2016;31(4):846-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.016

15. Figueras G, Planell RV, Serra Fernandez R, Biayna JC. Revision of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty with well fixed and positioned acetabular component using a dual- mobility head and review of literature. Open Orthop J 2016;10:512-21.
DOI: 10.2174/1874325001610010512

16. Sassoon AA, Barrack RL. Pseudotumour formation and subsequent resolution in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty following revision. Bone Joint J Br 2016;98(6):736-40.
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B6.36908

17. Valdez S, Bouxin B. Cotilos con doble movilidad: principios, ventajas y resultados. Rev Asoc Argent Ortop Traumatol 2009;74:102-10. http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.phpscript=sci_arttext&pid=S1852-74342009000100016

18. Hamadouche M, Arnould H, Bouxin B. Is cementless dual mobility socket in primary THA a reasonable option? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470(11):3048-53. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2395-3