Level of scientific evidence in the Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología. A comparison of two periods.

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))
Published: Sep 9, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15417/10
Keywords:
Evidence, Journal, Traumatology

Main Article Content

Juan Manuel Lopez Ovenza
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
Maximiliano Ranalletta
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
Gastón Maignon
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

Abstract

BackroundThe purpose of our study was to make a descriptive analysis of published articles in the 2006- 2007 biennium and to determine if there was an improvement in the level of evidence between 1996-1997 and 2006-2007.MethodsWere reviewed in retrospective study all the published articles in the years 1996-1997 and 2006-2007 bienniums in the Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología (RAAOT). Two hundred forty articles in the 1996-1997 and 2006-2007 bienniums were reviewed. In the 1996-1997 biennium were excluded from the analysis 8 of 134 (6%) articles that were based on experimental studies and for the biennium 2006-2007 were excluded 7 of 106 (6.6%) of the analysis, of which 6 were experimental articles.ResultsThe level of evidence of the RAAOT was 3.9 in the 2006-2007 biennium, while in the 1996-1997 biennium was 4.1. In the 1996-1997 biennium 6 out of 128 (4.4% ) were levels I, II, III while in 2006-2007 biennium 14 out 99 (14.1%) articles were of the same level (P < 0.02). Conclusions: According to our findings, we have found a significant improvement in the level of evidence. The average of level of evidence in the biennium 2006-2007ConclusionsAccording to our findings, we have found a significant improvement in the level of evidence. The average of level of evidence in the biennium 2006-2007 was 3.9.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Lopez Ovenza, J. M., Ranalletta, M., & Maignon, G. (2012). Level of scientific evidence in the Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología. A comparison of two periods. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 77(2), 147-150. https://doi.org/10.15417/10
Issue
Vol 77 No 2 (2012)
Section
Basic Research
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Manuscript acceptance by the Journal implies the simultaneous non-submission to any other journal or publishing house. The RAAOT is under the Licencia Creative Commnos Atribución-NoComercial-Compartir Obras Derivadas Igual 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC.SA 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es). Articles can be shared, copied, distributed, modified, altered, transformed into a derivative work, executed and publicly communicated, provided a) the authors and the original publication (Journal, Publisher and URL) are mentioned, b) they are not used for commercial purposes, c) the same terms of the license are maintained.

In the event that the manuscript is approved for its next publication, the authors retain the copyright and will assign to the journal the rights of publication, edition, reproduction, distribution, exhibition and communication at a national and international level in the different databases. data, repositories and portals.

It is hereby stated that the mentioned manuscript has not been published and that it is not being printed in any other national or foreign journal.

The authors hereby accept the necessary modifications, suggested by the reviewers, in order to adapt the manuscript to the style and publication rules of this Journal.

References

1. Bhandari M, Swiontkowski MF, Einhorn TA y col. Interobserver Agreement in the Application of Levels of Evidence to Scientific Papers in the American Volume of the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1717-20.

2. HanzlikSh, Mahabir RC, Baynosa RC y col..Levels of Evidence in Research Published in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) Over the Last Thirty Years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:425-8.

3. Lefaivre KA, Shadgan B, O’Brien PJ. 100 Most Cited Articles in Orthopaedic Surgery. ClinOrthopRelat Res. 2010; En prensa.

4. NoordinSh, Wright JG, Howard A. Relationship Between Declared Funding Support and Level of Evidence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1647-5.

5. Obremskey WT, Pappas N, Attallah-Wasif E y col.. Level of evidence in orthopaedic journals. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2632-8.

6. Okike K, Kocher MS, Mehlman CT y col.Nonscientific factors associated with acceptance for publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume).J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov;90(11):2432-7.

7. Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH. User´s Guides to the Medical Literature. JAMA. 1993;270 (3):2093-95.

8. Poolman RW, Struijs PA, Krips A y col.. Does a "Level I Evidence" Rating Imply high Quality of Reporting in OrthopaedicRandomised Controlled trials?.BMC. 2006;44 (6):1-8.

9. Sackett DL. Rules of Evidence and Clinical Recommendations on the use of Antithrombotic Agents. Chest. 1986;89(2 Suppl):2S-3S.

10. Sprague SH, Bhandari M, Dereraux DJ, SwiontkowskiMF y col..Barriers to Full-Text PublicationFollowing Presentation of Abstracts at Annual Orthopaedic Meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:158-63.

11. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD. Introducing Levels of Evidence to the Journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1-3.

Most read articles by the same author(s)