Unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with ITST short intramedullary nails. Quality of life assessment and functional recovery.

Main Article Content

Federico José Burgo
Diego Edmundo Mengelle
José Andrés Aliaga Sáenz
Mariano Agustín Codesido
Juan Pablo Sambucetti
Carlos María Autorino

Abstract

BackroundThe aim of the present study consisted on evaluating a consecutive series of patients with unstable inter or subtrochanteric fractures (AO 3.1 A2 and A3) treated with short ITST nail fixation, focusing mainly on quality of life and functional recovery.Method171 patients were included with intertrochanteric hip fractures (AO 3.1 A2 and A3), all treated with ITST nails between June 2004 and June 2012. The average age was 79 years (62-96), and a minimum follow-up of 14 months. The parameters that were evaluated are: quality of life using the WOMAC reduced scale converted to a 1 to a 100 scale; functional recovery based on the time needed to achieve standing position, need for orthesis at the end of the follow-up, and the return to daily-life activites using the function scale of the American Musculoesqueletical Tumors Society.ResultsAfter 14 months the average WOMAC was 77. Seventy three percent of the group was walking within the 36 hours of the surgery, 48% of the patients were able to return to their daily-life activities with a minimum restriction, and the rest only presented partial or recreational restrictions. Considering the group that didn´t use orthesis before the surgery, the 71% was able to maintain this condition at the end of the follow-up. The incidence of complications was 6.5% intra-procedure and 23% post-procedure. The nail distal fracture and the “cut-out” were observed in only 1% of the cases.DiscussionThe low incidence of nail distal fracture and the “cut-out”, together with the early return to the daily activities and the good quality of life and function; make the short ITST nail fixation the treatment of election for the unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Burgo, F. J., Mengelle, D. E., Aliaga Sáenz, J. A., Codesido, M. A., Sambucetti, J. P., & Autorino, C. M. (2015). Unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with ITST short intramedullary nails. Quality of life assessment and functional recovery. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 80(3), 177-184. https://doi.org/10.15417/358
Section
Clinical Research
Author Biography

Carlos María Autorino, Hospital Universitario Austral

Jefe de Servicio Ortopedia y TraumatologíaHospital Universitario Austral.

References

1. Harstedt M, Rogmark C, Sutton R, Melander O, Fedorowski A, et al. Impact of comorbidity on 6-month hospital readmission and
mortality after hip fracture surgery. Injury 2014;46(4):713-8.

2. Haleem S, Lutchman L, Mayahi R, Grice JE, Parker MJ. Mortality following hip fracture: trends and geographical variations over
the last 40 years. Injury 2008;39:1157-63.

3. Adams CI, Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail
versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma 2001;15:394-400.

4. Aktselis I, Kokoroghiannis C, Fragkomichalos E, Koundis G, Deligeorgis A, Daskalakis E, et al. Prospective randomised
controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus a sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. Int Orthop
2014;38:155-61.

5. Barton TM, Gleeson R, Topliss C, Greenwood R, Harries WJ, Chesser TJ. A comparison of the long gamma nail with the sliding
hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures of the proximal part of the femur: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone
Joint Surg Am 2010;92:792-8.

6. Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular
hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008:CD000093.

7. Ahrengart L, Tornkvist H, Fornander P, Thorngren KG, Pasanen L, Wahlström P, et al. A randomized study of the compression
hip screw and Gamma nail in 426 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;401:209-22.

8. Bhandari M, Schemitsch E, Jonsson A, Zlowodzki M, Haidukewych GJ. Gamma nails revisited: gamma nails versus compression
hip screws in the management of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 2009;23:460-4.

9. Davis TR, Sher JL, Horsman A, Simpson M, Porter BB, Checketts RG. Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure
after internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:26-31.

10. Albareda J, Laderiga A, Palanca D, Paniagua L, Seral F. Complications and technical problems with the gamma nail. Int Orthop
1996;20:47-50.

11. Rosenblum SF, Zuckerman JD, Kummer FJ, Tam BS. A biomechanical evaluation of the Gamma nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br
1992;74:352-7.

12. Herrera A, Domingo J, Martinez A. Results of osteosynthesis with the ITST nail in fractures of the trochanteric region of the
femur. Int Orthop 2008;32:767-72.

13. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of
peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1058-64.

14. Callaghan JJ, Dorr LD, Engh GA, Hanssen AD, Healy WL, Lachiewicz PF, et al. Prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease:
recommendations from the American College of Chest Physicians--are they appropriate for orthopaedic surgery? J Arthroplasty
2005;20:273-4.

15. Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, Azkárate J, Güenaga JI. Validation of the Spanish version of the WOMAC questionnaire
for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Clin Rheumatol
2002;21:466-71.

16. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive
procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;286:241-6.

17. Han CD, Lee YH, Yang KH, Yang IH, Lee WS, Park YJ, et al. Relationship between distal screws and femoral arteries in closed
hip nailing on computed tomography angiography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013;133:361-6.

18. Wallace W. The increasing incidence of fractures of the proximal femur: an orthopaedic epidemic. Lancet 1983;1(8339):1413-4.

19. Herrera A, Domingo LJ, Calvo A, Martínez A, Cuenca J. A comparative study of trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma
nail or the proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 2002;26:365-9.

20. Lichtblau S. Treatment of hip fractures in the elderly. The decision process. Mount Sinai J Med 2002;69:250-60.

21. Utrilla AL, Reig JS, Munoz FM, Tufanisco CB. Trochanteric gamma nail and compression hip screw for trochanteric fractures:
a randomized, prospective, comparative study in 210 elderly patients with a new design of the gamma nail. J Orthop Trauma
2005;19:229-33.

22. Stannard JP, Bankston L, Futch LA, McGwin G, Volgas DA. Functional outcome following intramedullary nailing of the
femur: a prospective randomized comparison of piriformis fossa and greater trochanteric entry portals. J Bone Joint Surg Am
2011;93:1385-91.

Most read articles by the same author(s)