Autologous ­graft­ versus­ fresh ­frozen­ allograft ­in ­instrumented lumbar surgery.­ Clinical­ and­ radiological ­results

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España)) Figura 1 (Español (España)) Figura 1 (Español (España)) Figura 2 (Español (España)) Figura 2 (Español (España))
Published: Mar 10, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15417/223
Keywords:
Fresh frozen bone allograft. Autograft. Lumbar fusion.

Main Article Content

Pablo N. Ortiz
Sanatorio Allende
Diego N. Flores Kanter
Sanatorio Allende

Abstract

AbstractBackground: The effectiveness of fresh frozen bone allograft is controversial in lumbar fusion. The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay and radiological results, using autologous graft versus fresh frozen bone allograft in instrumented lumbar fusion surgery.Methods: We analyzed 32 patients from January 2009 to May 2011 treated with one level instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion. They were divided into two groups, Group A: autologous graft, Group B: fresh frozen bone allograft. Before surgery, we used the visual analogue scale (severity of symptoms) and the ODI index (quality of life), in the postoperative period, ODI index was performed again and Bridwell classification was used in computed tomography to evaluate fusion. We evaluated the duration of surgery and hospital stay. Observational, analytical, prospective and randomized study, with therapeutic value.Results: There were no significant differences between the groups: quality of life: improvement in group A: 55.26%, group B: 55.30% (p<0.9); surgical time: group A, 169.4 minutes on average, group B, 148 minutes (p <0.16); hospital stay: group A, 73.3 hours on average, group B, 58.7 hours (p <0.12); posterolateral fusion rate: group A, 94.74%, group B, 92.31% (p <0.57).Conclusion: Although the differences between fresh frozen bone allograft and autograft were not significant, a shorter surgical time and reduction on hospital stay in the fresh frozen bone allograft group show that this is a suitable choice to autograft. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Ortiz, P. N., & Flores Kanter, D. N. (2014). Autologous ­graft­ versus­ fresh ­frozen­ allograft ­in ­instrumented lumbar surgery.­ Clinical­ and­ radiological ­results. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 79(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.15417/223
Issue
Vol 79 No 1 (2014)
Section
Clinical Research
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Manuscript acceptance by the Journal implies the simultaneous non-submission to any other journal or publishing house. The RAAOT is under the Licencia Creative Commnos Atribución-NoComercial-Compartir Obras Derivadas Igual 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC.SA 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es). Articles can be shared, copied, distributed, modified, altered, transformed into a derivative work, executed and publicly communicated, provided a) the authors and the original publication (Journal, Publisher and URL) are mentioned, b) they are not used for commercial purposes, c) the same terms of the license are maintained.

In the event that the manuscript is approved for its next publication, the authors retain the copyright and will assign to the journal the rights of publication, edition, reproduction, distribution, exhibition and communication at a national and international level in the different databases. data, repositories and portals.

It is hereby stated that the mentioned manuscript has not been published and that it is not being printed in any other national or foreign journal.

The authors hereby accept the necessary modifications, suggested by the reviewers, in order to adapt the manuscript to the style and publication rules of this Journal.