Subjective Evaluation of Subclavicular Hypoesthesia After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Clavicle Fractures
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To determine the prevalence of subclavicular hypoesthesia following open reduction and internal fixation for clavicle fracture, as well as if and how it impacts the patient’s quality of life.
Materials and Methods: A prospective cross-sectional analytical study of patients with displaced clavicle midshaft fractures treated with ORIF between 2018-2021 was performed. The research team used a questionnaire with six items that were completed anonymously. The presence of infraclavicular hypoesthesia, regional pain, and daily life interference was assessed.
Results: Twenty-nine patients treated surgically with a longitudinal approach and with a minimum postoperative follow-up of one year were evaluated. Twenty-two patients (76%) had altered sensitivity, whereas seven (24%) denied the existence of the symptom. In 97% of individuals with subclavicular hypoesthesia, quality of life was impaired minimally or not at all.
Conclusions: Before undergoing surgery, it is important to inform the patient about the risk of cutaneous numbness as a postoperative consequence due to its high frequency but improbable impact on daily activities.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
Manuscript acceptance by the Journal implies the simultaneous non-submission to any other journal or publishing house. The RAAOT is under the Licencia Creative Commnos Atribución-NoComercial-Compartir Obras Derivadas Igual 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC.SA 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es). Articles can be shared, copied, distributed, modified, altered, transformed into a derivative work, executed and publicly communicated, provided a) the authors and the original publication (Journal, Publisher and URL) are mentioned, b) they are not used for commercial purposes, c) the same terms of the license are maintained.
In the event that the manuscript is approved for its next publication, the authors retain the copyright and will assign to the journal the rights of publication, edition, reproduction, distribution, exhibition and communication at a national and international level in the different databases. data, repositories and portals.
It is hereby stated that the mentioned manuscript has not been published and that it is not being printed in any other national or foreign journal.
The authors hereby accept the necessary modifications, suggested by the reviewers, in order to adapt the manuscript to the style and publication rules of this Journal.
References
2. Burnham J, Kim D, Kamineni S. Midshaft clavicle fractures: A critical review. Orthopedics 2016;39(5):e814-21.
https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20160517-06
3. Li R, Ke T, Xiong S, Xiong G, Lin Z, Lin F. Comparison of the effectiveness of oblique and transverse incisions in
the treatment of fractures of the middle and outer third of the clavicle. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019;28(7):1308-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.03.021
4. Li T, He J, Wu J, Qian G, Geng L, Huang H, et al. Supraclavicular nerves protection during open reduction and
internal fixation. Int J Clin Exp Med 2017;10(5):8558-65. Disponible en: https://e century.us/files/ijcem/10/5/ijcem0038714.pdf
5. Shukla D, Rubenstein W, Barnes L, Klion M, Gladstone J, Kim J, et al. The influence of incision type on patient
satisfaction after plate fixation of clavicle fractures. Orthop J Sports Med 2017;5(6):2325967117712235.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117712235
6. Ropars M, Thomazeau H, Huten D. Clavicle fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017;103(1S):S53-S59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.007
7. Havet E, Duparc F, Tobenas-Dujardin A, Muller J, Fréger P. Morphometric study of the shoulder and subclavicular innervation by the intermediate and lateral branches of supraclavicular nerves. Surg Radiol Anat 2007;29(8):605-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-007-0258-5
8. Ou L, Yang L, Zhao J, Su W. Cutaneous paresthesia after internal plate fixation of clavicle fractures and underlying anatomical observations. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97(41):e12729. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012729
9. Wang L, Ang M, Lee K, Naidu G, Kwek E. Cutaneous hypoesthesia following plate fixation in clavicle fractures.
Indian J Orthop 2014;48(1):10-3. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.125478
10. Cárdenas G. Osteosíntesis mínimamente invasiva con placa anatómica bloqueada en fracturas desplazadas del tercio medio de clavícula. Acta Ortop Mex 2021;35(5):479-85. https://doi.org/10.35366/104579
11. Devkota P, Acharya B, Pradhan N, Shrestha S, Thakur A, Gyawali B. Minimally-invasive plate osteosynthesis for clavicle fractures. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2021;57(2):295-300. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731358
12. Mendes A Jr, Curado R, Dias J Jr, Neto J, Carrazzone O, Pagán A, et al. Protocol of BRICS: Brazilian multicentric
pragmatic randomized trial of surgical interventions for displaced diaphyseal clavicle fracture study: MIPO versus ORIF for the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. BMJ Open 2021;11(10):e052966.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052966
13. O´Neill K, Stutz C, Duvernay M, Schoenecker J. Supraclavicular nerve entrapment and clavicular fracture. J Orthop Trauma 2012;26(6):e63-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117712235