ROSA Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Replacement
Article Sidebar
Published:
Dec 31, 2022
Keywords:
ROSA, robotics, robotic-assisted TKR
Main Article Content
Abstract
Total knee replacement is a procedure with excellent outcomes as long as the objectives of alignment and ligament balance are met. Postoperative comfort and well-being are achieved through a suitable implant for each patient and the correct positioning of the prosthesis. The ROSA robotic system uses information collected before and during surgery, and provides the surgeon with the necessary tools to reproduce the specific anatomy of each patient. In this way, personalized implants are achieved based on the anatomical landmarks of each individual and planning based on specific biometric data.Level of Evidence: IV
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
Article Details
How to Cite
Zuain, A., Costantini, J., Yacuzzi, C., & Costa Paz, M. (2022). ROSA Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Replacement. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 87(6), 838-850. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2022.87.6.1579
Issue
Section
Review article
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología
Manuscript acceptance by the Journal implies the simultaneous non-submission to any other journal or publishing house. The RAAOT is under the Licencia Creative Commnos Atribución-NoComercial-Compartir Obras Derivadas Igual 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC.SA 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es). Articles can be shared, copied, distributed, modified, altered, transformed into a derivative work, executed and publicly communicated, provided a) the authors and the original publication (Journal, Publisher and URL) are mentioned, b) they are not used for commercial purposes, c) the same terms of the license are maintained.
In the event that the manuscript is approved for its next publication, the authors retain the copyright and will assign to the journal the rights of publication, edition, reproduction, distribution, exhibition and communication at a national and international level in the different databases. data, repositories and portals.
It is hereby stated that the mentioned manuscript has not been published and that it is not being printed in any other national or foreign journal.
The authors hereby accept the necessary modifications, suggested by the reviewers, in order to adapt the manuscript to the style and publication rules of this Journal.
References
1. Halawi MJ, Jongbloed W, Baron S, Savoy L, Williams VJ, Cote MP. Patient dissatisfaction after primary total joint
arthroplasty: the patient perspective. J Arthroplasty 2019;34(6):1093-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.075
2. Palazzo C, Jourdan C, Descamps S, Nizard R, Hamadouche M, Anract P, et al. Determinants of satisfaction 1 year after total hip arthroplasty: the role of expectations fulfilment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:53.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-53
3. Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK. Meta-analysis of navigation vs
conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012;27(6):1177-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.028
4. Bollars P, Boeckxstaens A, Mievis J, Kalaai S, Schotanus MGM, Janssen D. Preliminary experience with an imagefree handheld robot for total knee arthroplasty: 77 cases compared with a matched control group. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2020;30(4):723-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02624-3
5. Liow MHL, Xia Z, Wong MK, Tay KJ, Yeo SJ, Chin PL. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores
the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised study. J Arthroplasty 2014;29(12):2373-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.010
6. Smith AF, Eccles CJ, Bhimani SJ, Denehy KM, Bhimani RB, Smith LS, et al. Improved patient satisfaction
following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2021;34(7):730-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700837
7. Figueroa F, Wakelin E, Twiggs J, Fritsch B. Comparison between navigated reported position and postoperative
computed tomography to evaluate accuracy in a robotic navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Knee
2019;26(4):869-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.05.004
8. Hampp EL, Chughtai M, Scholl LY, Sodhi N, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Jacofsky DJ, et al. Robotic-arm assisted total
knee arthroplasty demonstrated greater accuracy and precision to plan compared with manual techniques. J Knee Surg 2019;32(3):239-50. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1641729
9. Mullaji A, Kanna R, Marawar S, Kohli A, Sharma A. Comparison of limb and component alignment using
computer-assisted navigation versus image intensifier-guided conventional total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, single-surgeon study of 467 knees. J Arthroplasty 2007;22(7):953-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.030
10. Bautista M, Manrique J, Hozack WJ. Robotics in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2019;32(7):600-6.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1681053
11. Sires JD, Craik JD, Wilson CJ. Accuracy of bone resection in MAKO total knee robotic-assisted surgery. J Knee
Surg 2021;34(7):745-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700570
12. Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Anis HK, Ehiorobo J, Newman JM, Taylor K, et al. One-year patient outcomes for roboticarm-assisted versus manual total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2019;32(11):1063-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1683977
13. Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is
associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with
conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 2018;100-B(7):930-7.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1449.R1
14. Biant LC, Yeoh K, Walker PM, Bruce WJM, Walsh WR. The accuracy of bone resections made during computer
navigated total knee replacement. Do we resect what the computer plans we resect? Knee 2008;15(3):238-41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2008.01.012
15. Casper M, Mitra R, Khare R, Jaramaz B, Hamlin B, McGinley B, et al. Accuracy assessment of a novel image-free handheld robot for total knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon) 2018;23(1):14-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2018.1519038
16. Batailler C, Hannouche D, Benazzo F, Parratte S. Concepts and techniques of a new robotically assisted
technique for total knee arthroplasty: the ROSA knee system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021;141(12):2049-58.
https://10.1007/s00402-021-04048-y
17. Massé V, Ghate RS. Using standard X-ray images to create 3D digital bone models and patient-matched guides for aiding implant positioning and sizing in total knee arthroplasty. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon) 2021;26(1):31-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2021.1894239
18. Lustig S, Fleury C, Goy D, Neyret P, Donell ST. The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted
system and its implication for knee arthroplasty. Knee 2011;18(1):15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2009.12.010
19. Parratte S, Price AJ, Jeys LM, Jackson WF, Clarke HD. Accuracy of a new robotically assisted technique for total
knee arthroplasty: A cadaveric study. J Arthroplasty 2019;34(11):2799-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.040
20. Seidenstein A, Birmingham M, Foran J, Ogden S. Better accuracy and reproducibility of a new robotically-assisted system for total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a cadaveric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021;29(3):859-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06038-w
arthroplasty: the patient perspective. J Arthroplasty 2019;34(6):1093-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.075
2. Palazzo C, Jourdan C, Descamps S, Nizard R, Hamadouche M, Anract P, et al. Determinants of satisfaction 1 year after total hip arthroplasty: the role of expectations fulfilment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:53.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-53
3. Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK. Meta-analysis of navigation vs
conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012;27(6):1177-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.028
4. Bollars P, Boeckxstaens A, Mievis J, Kalaai S, Schotanus MGM, Janssen D. Preliminary experience with an imagefree handheld robot for total knee arthroplasty: 77 cases compared with a matched control group. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2020;30(4):723-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02624-3
5. Liow MHL, Xia Z, Wong MK, Tay KJ, Yeo SJ, Chin PL. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores
the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised study. J Arthroplasty 2014;29(12):2373-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.010
6. Smith AF, Eccles CJ, Bhimani SJ, Denehy KM, Bhimani RB, Smith LS, et al. Improved patient satisfaction
following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2021;34(7):730-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700837
7. Figueroa F, Wakelin E, Twiggs J, Fritsch B. Comparison between navigated reported position and postoperative
computed tomography to evaluate accuracy in a robotic navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Knee
2019;26(4):869-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.05.004
8. Hampp EL, Chughtai M, Scholl LY, Sodhi N, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Jacofsky DJ, et al. Robotic-arm assisted total
knee arthroplasty demonstrated greater accuracy and precision to plan compared with manual techniques. J Knee Surg 2019;32(3):239-50. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1641729
9. Mullaji A, Kanna R, Marawar S, Kohli A, Sharma A. Comparison of limb and component alignment using
computer-assisted navigation versus image intensifier-guided conventional total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, single-surgeon study of 467 knees. J Arthroplasty 2007;22(7):953-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.030
10. Bautista M, Manrique J, Hozack WJ. Robotics in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2019;32(7):600-6.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1681053
11. Sires JD, Craik JD, Wilson CJ. Accuracy of bone resection in MAKO total knee robotic-assisted surgery. J Knee
Surg 2021;34(7):745-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700570
12. Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Anis HK, Ehiorobo J, Newman JM, Taylor K, et al. One-year patient outcomes for roboticarm-assisted versus manual total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2019;32(11):1063-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1683977
13. Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is
associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with
conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 2018;100-B(7):930-7.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1449.R1
14. Biant LC, Yeoh K, Walker PM, Bruce WJM, Walsh WR. The accuracy of bone resections made during computer
navigated total knee replacement. Do we resect what the computer plans we resect? Knee 2008;15(3):238-41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2008.01.012
15. Casper M, Mitra R, Khare R, Jaramaz B, Hamlin B, McGinley B, et al. Accuracy assessment of a novel image-free handheld robot for total knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon) 2018;23(1):14-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2018.1519038
16. Batailler C, Hannouche D, Benazzo F, Parratte S. Concepts and techniques of a new robotically assisted
technique for total knee arthroplasty: the ROSA knee system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021;141(12):2049-58.
https://10.1007/s00402-021-04048-y
17. Massé V, Ghate RS. Using standard X-ray images to create 3D digital bone models and patient-matched guides for aiding implant positioning and sizing in total knee arthroplasty. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon) 2021;26(1):31-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2021.1894239
18. Lustig S, Fleury C, Goy D, Neyret P, Donell ST. The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted
system and its implication for knee arthroplasty. Knee 2011;18(1):15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2009.12.010
19. Parratte S, Price AJ, Jeys LM, Jackson WF, Clarke HD. Accuracy of a new robotically assisted technique for total
knee arthroplasty: A cadaveric study. J Arthroplasty 2019;34(11):2799-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.040
20. Seidenstein A, Birmingham M, Foran J, Ogden S. Better accuracy and reproducibility of a new robotically-assisted system for total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a cadaveric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021;29(3):859-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06038-w