Thermoplastic Brace Treatment for Humerus Fractures
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Materials and Methods: Retrospective study of patients with closed humerus fractures, treated with a thermoplastic brace until union and with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. We recorded the type and location of the fracture, mechanism of injury, injured limb, time of immobilization with plaster and use of brace, complications, and time of consolidation. The evaluation was performed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Likert scale for patient satisfaction, the Constant scale for joint balance, and the QuickDash score for functionality.
Results: 17 patients were included (16 female, 1 male), with an average age of 67 years. The initial plaster immobilization lasted 13 days (range 0-32). The patients wore the brace for 8.6 weeks (range 3-16) until radiographic consolidation in the 10th week. The average follow-up was 24 months (range 12-60) and the pain score was 0.5 (range 1-3). 59% were very satisfied with the results and 41% were satisfied. 59% achieved a shoulder flexion >150°; 47%, an abduction >150°; 41%, an internal rotation with thumb between scapulae; and 47%, an external rotation of 70°. The average QuickDASH score was 9.
Conclusion: The use of a thermoplastic brace in the conservative treatment of humerus fractures presented high patient satisfaction and acceptable functional outcomes for the affected limb.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
Manuscript acceptance by the Journal implies the simultaneous non-submission to any other journal or publishing house. The RAAOT is under the Licencia Creative Commnos Atribución-NoComercial-Compartir Obras Derivadas Igual 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC.SA 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es). Articles can be shared, copied, distributed, modified, altered, transformed into a derivative work, executed and publicly communicated, provided a) the authors and the original publication (Journal, Publisher and URL) are mentioned, b) they are not used for commercial purposes, c) the same terms of the license are maintained.
In the event that the manuscript is approved for its next publication, the authors retain the copyright and will assign to the journal the rights of publication, edition, reproduction, distribution, exhibition and communication at a national and international level in the different databases. data, repositories and portals.
It is hereby stated that the mentioned manuscript has not been published and that it is not being printed in any other national or foreign journal.
The authors hereby accept the necessary modifications, suggested by the reviewers, in order to adapt the manuscript to the style and publication rules of this Journal.
References
humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977;59(5):596-601. PMID:873955
2. Updegrove GF, Mourad W, Abboud J. Humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27(4):e87-e97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.028
3. Colditz JC. Functional fracture bracing. En: Skirven T, Osterman A, Fedorczyk J, Amadio P. Rehabilitation of the
hand and upper extremity, 6th ed., Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2011:1620-9.
4. Naver L, Aalberg R. Humeral shaft fractures treated with a ready-made fracture brace. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1986;106(1):20-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435647
5. Walker M, Palumbo B, Badman B, Brooks J, Van Gelderen J, Mighell M. Humeral shaft fractures: a review. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011;20(5):833-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.030
6. Pehlivan O. Functional treatment of the distal third humeral shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002;
122(7):390-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-002-0403-x
7. Ali E, Griffiths D, Obi N, Tytherleigh-Strong G, Van Rensburg L. Nonoperative treatment of humeral shaft fractures revisited. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(2):210-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.009
8. Rutgers M, Ring D. Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus using a functional brace. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20(9):597-601. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bot.0000249423.48074082
9. Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA, Latta LL, Capps CC. Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the
humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82(4):478-86. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200004000-00003
10. Wallny T, Sagebiel C, Westerman K, Wagner UA, Reimer M. Comparative results of bracing and interlocking
nailing in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Int Orthop 1997;21(6):374-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002640050189
11. Zagorski JB, Latta LL, Zych GA, Finnieston AR. Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. Treatment with prefabricated braces. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70(4):607-10. PMID: 3356728
12. Koch PP, Gross DF, Gerber C. The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11(2):143-50. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2002.121634