Caudal Epidural Block Outcomes in Economically Active Patients With Low Back Pain

Keywords: Caudal epidural injection, caudal block, missing working days, low back pain, return-to-work

Abstract

Introduction: Low back pain is a very common health problem worldwide and a major cause of disability, affecting performance at work and general well-being. It is included in the priority diseases list of the World Health Organization (WHO). Low back pain is one of the leading causes of work absence worldwide. The caudal epidural block is a popular approach in managing lumbar pain conditions in adults. Materials and Methods: An observational, descriptive, retrospective study was conducted in our institution,from January 2017 to January 2019, on patients who had undergone caudal epidural block for low back pain. We excluded patients with a history of previous epidural blocks, lumbar surgery, or who were lost to follow up. We collected patient demographic and clinical data (including age, sex, etc) and procedure outcomes (pain score, surgery performed, lost working days, and return to work activity). Results: 38 patients were included. Mean age was 43 (27- 62) years old. Mean pain scores 3 months after treatment were 3.5 (2 – 6) with a difference of 4.5 (IQR -2.7 – -7) from baseline values. This was statistically significant. 55.3% (n=21) of patients returned to active duty in the first month; it is important to note that 52.4% of those (n=11) did it after the first week. Conclusions: The improvement of pain scores after the procedures was statistically significant. The mean return to work at the end of the first month was 55.3%, and 76.2% of those (N= 16) did it after the first two weeks  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Micaela Besse, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service,“Victorio Franchín” Sanatorium, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Orthopedics and Traumatology Service,“Victorio Franchín” Sanatorium, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
José Francisco Baigorria, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service,“Victorio Franchín” Sanatorium, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Orthopedics and Traumatology Service,“Victorio Franchín” Sanatorium, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
José Antonio Rosado Pardo, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service,“Victorio Franchín” Sanatorium, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Orthopedics and Traumatology Service,“Victorio Franchín” Sanatorium, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Ricardo Baldasarre, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service,“Victorio Franchín” Sanatorium, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Orthopedics and Traumatology Service,“Victorio Franchín” Sanatorium, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Leandro Ambrosini, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service,“Victorio Franchín” Sanatorium, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Orthopedics and Traumatology Service,“Victorio Franchín” Sanatorium, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Aníbal José Sarotto, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service,“Victorio Franchín” Sanatorium, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Orthopedics and Traumatology Service,“Victorio Franchín” Sanatorium, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

References

WHO. Priority Medicines for Europe and the World 2013 Update. Disponible en:

https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/priority_medicines/Ch6_24LBP.pdf

Duthey B. Update on 2004 Background Paper, BP 6.24 Low back pain. Priority Medicines for Europe and the

World. “A Public Health Approach to Innovation”. WHO. Disponible en:

https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/priority_medicines/BP6_24LBP.pdf

Cortiñas Sáenz M, Iglesias Cerrillo JA, Cano Navarro G, Salmerón Cerezuela J, Quirante Pizarro JA, Carricondo

Martínez MI, et al. Bloqueo caudal en dolor crónico lumbar. ¿Es necesario el apoyo radiológico para disminuir los

fallos de la técnica? Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2012;19(4):174-80. Disponible en:

http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1134-80462012000400003

Higson RA, Edwuars WB. An analysis of the first ten thousand confinements managed with continuous caudal

analgesia with a report of the authors, first one thousand cases. JAMA 1943;123(9):538-46.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1943.02840440020006

Dieng P, Diouf E, Diene JF. Caudal epidural anesthesia in 70 children. Dakar Med 1994;39:95 7. PMID: 7493530

Dawkins CJM. An analysis of the complications of extradural and caudal block. Anaesthesia 1969;24(4):554-63.

https//doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1969.tb02909.x

Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Ferreira ML, Hancock MJ, Oliveira VC, McLachlan AJ, et al. Epidural corticosteroid

injections for sciatica. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2020;45(21):E1405-E1415. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003651

Conn A, MD, Buenaventura RM, Datta S, Abdi S, Diwan S. Systematic review of caudal epidural injections in the

management of chronic low back pain. Pain Physician 2009;12:109-35. PMID: 19165299

Parr AT, Manchikanti L, Hameed H, Conn A, Manchikanti KN, Benyamin RM, et al. Caudal epidural injections

in the management of chronic low back pain: a systematic appraisal of the literature. Pain Physician 2012;

(3):E159-E198. PMID: 22622911

Nandi J, Chowdhery A. RCT to determine effectiveness of caudal epidural steroid injection in lumbosacral sciatica. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11(2):RC04-RC08. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/21905.9392

Kao SC, Lin CS. Caudal epidural block: an updated review of anatomy and techniques. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017: 9217145. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9217145

Waldman SD. Caudal epidural nerve block: prone position. En: Waldman SD (ed.). Atlas of interventional pain

management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004:380-92.

Stitz MY, Sommer HM. Accuracy of blind versus fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injection. Spine (Phila PA 1976) 1999;24(13):1371-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199907010-00016

Aggarwal A, Aggarwal A, Harjeet, Sahni D. Morphometry of sacral hiatus and its clinical relevance in caudal

epidural block. Surg Radiol Anat 2009;31(10):793-800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0529-4

Low Back Pain Fact Sheet. NIH. NINDS, Publication date December 2014. Publication No. 15-5161. Disponible en: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/Patient-Caregiver-Education/Fact-Sheets/Low-Back-Pain-Fact-Sheet

Wynne-Jones G, Cowen J, Jordan JL, Uthman O, Main CJ, Glozier N, et al. Absence from work and return to work in people with back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med 2014;71(6):448-56.

https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2013-101571

Estadísticas sobre Accidentabilidad Laboral. Ministerio de Trabajo, Empleo y Seguridad Social, Superintendencia de Riesgos del Trabajo 2007. Disponible en:

www.infoleg.gob.ar/basehome/actos_gobierno/actosdegobierno7-12-2009-3.htm

Departamento de Estudios y Estadísticas. Informe Anual de Accidentabilidad Laboral 2017. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Superintendencia de Riesgos del Trabajo. Disponible en:

https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/informe_anual_de_accidentabilidad_laboral_-_ano_2017.pdf

Published
2021-12-16
How to Cite
Besse, M., Baigorria, J. F., Rosado Pardo, J. A., Baldasarre, R., Ambrosini, L., & Sarotto, A. J. (2021). Caudal Epidural Block Outcomes in Economically Active Patients With Low Back Pain. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 86(6), 763-770. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2021.86.6.1339
Section
Clinical Research