Reemplazo total de rodilla asistido por el robot ROSA
Barra lateral del artículo
Publicado:
dic 31, 2022
Palabras clave:
ROSA, robótica, reemplazo total de rodilla asistido
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El reemplazo total de rodilla es un procedimiento con excelentes resultados, siempre y cuando se alcancen los objetivos de alineación y balance ligamentario. El confort y el bienestar posoperatorios se logran mediante un implante adecuado para cada paciente y el correcto posicionamiento de la prótesis. El sistema robótico ROSA utiliza información recolectada antes de la cirugía y durante esta, y le otorga al cirujano las herramientas necesarias para reproducir la anatomía específica de cada paciente. De esta manera, se logran implantes personalizados basados en los reparos anatómicos de cada individuo y en una planificación apartir de datos biométricos concretos.
Nivel de Evidencia: IV
Nivel de Evidencia: IV
Descargas
La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Métricas
Cargando métricas ...
Detalles del artículo
Cómo citar
Zuain, A., Costantini, J., Yacuzzi, C., & Costa Paz, M. (2022). Reemplazo total de rodilla asistido por el robot ROSA. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 87(6), 838-850. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2022.87.6.1579
Número
Sección
Actualización
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología
La aceptación del manuscrito por parte de la revista implica la no presentación simultánea a otras revistas u órganos editoriales. La RAAOT se encuentra bajo la licencia Creative Commons 4.0. Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es). Se puede compartir, copiar, distribuir, alterar, transformar, generar una obra derivada, ejecutar y comunicar públicamente la obra, siempre que: a) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); b) no se usen para fines comerciales; c) se mantengan los mismos términos de la licencia.
En caso de que el manuscrito sea aprobado para su próxima publicación, los autores conservan los derechos de autor y cederán a la revista los derechos de la publicación, edición, reproducción, distribución, exhibición y comunicación a nivel nacional e internacional en las diferentes bases de datos, repositorios y portales.
Se deja constancia que el referido artículo es inédito y que no está en espera de impresión en alguna otra publicación nacional o extranjera.
Por la presente, acepta/n las modificaciones que sean necesarias, sugeridas en la revisión por los pares (referato), para adaptar el trabajo al estilo y modalidad de publicación de la Revista.
Citas
1. Halawi MJ, Jongbloed W, Baron S, Savoy L, Williams VJ, Cote MP. Patient dissatisfaction after primary total joint
arthroplasty: the patient perspective. J Arthroplasty 2019;34(6):1093-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.075
2. Palazzo C, Jourdan C, Descamps S, Nizard R, Hamadouche M, Anract P, et al. Determinants of satisfaction 1 year after total hip arthroplasty: the role of expectations fulfilment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:53.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-53
3. Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK. Meta-analysis of navigation vs
conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012;27(6):1177-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.028
4. Bollars P, Boeckxstaens A, Mievis J, Kalaai S, Schotanus MGM, Janssen D. Preliminary experience with an imagefree handheld robot for total knee arthroplasty: 77 cases compared with a matched control group. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2020;30(4):723-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02624-3
5. Liow MHL, Xia Z, Wong MK, Tay KJ, Yeo SJ, Chin PL. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores
the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised study. J Arthroplasty 2014;29(12):2373-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.010
6. Smith AF, Eccles CJ, Bhimani SJ, Denehy KM, Bhimani RB, Smith LS, et al. Improved patient satisfaction
following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2021;34(7):730-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700837
7. Figueroa F, Wakelin E, Twiggs J, Fritsch B. Comparison between navigated reported position and postoperative
computed tomography to evaluate accuracy in a robotic navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Knee
2019;26(4):869-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.05.004
8. Hampp EL, Chughtai M, Scholl LY, Sodhi N, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Jacofsky DJ, et al. Robotic-arm assisted total
knee arthroplasty demonstrated greater accuracy and precision to plan compared with manual techniques. J Knee Surg 2019;32(3):239-50. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1641729
9. Mullaji A, Kanna R, Marawar S, Kohli A, Sharma A. Comparison of limb and component alignment using
computer-assisted navigation versus image intensifier-guided conventional total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, single-surgeon study of 467 knees. J Arthroplasty 2007;22(7):953-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.030
10. Bautista M, Manrique J, Hozack WJ. Robotics in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2019;32(7):600-6.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1681053
11. Sires JD, Craik JD, Wilson CJ. Accuracy of bone resection in MAKO total knee robotic-assisted surgery. J Knee
Surg 2021;34(7):745-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700570
12. Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Anis HK, Ehiorobo J, Newman JM, Taylor K, et al. One-year patient outcomes for roboticarm-assisted versus manual total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2019;32(11):1063-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1683977
13. Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is
associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with
conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 2018;100-B(7):930-7.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1449.R1
14. Biant LC, Yeoh K, Walker PM, Bruce WJM, Walsh WR. The accuracy of bone resections made during computer
navigated total knee replacement. Do we resect what the computer plans we resect? Knee 2008;15(3):238-41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2008.01.012
15. Casper M, Mitra R, Khare R, Jaramaz B, Hamlin B, McGinley B, et al. Accuracy assessment of a novel image-free handheld robot for total knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon) 2018;23(1):14-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2018.1519038
16. Batailler C, Hannouche D, Benazzo F, Parratte S. Concepts and techniques of a new robotically assisted
technique for total knee arthroplasty: the ROSA knee system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021;141(12):2049-58.
https://10.1007/s00402-021-04048-y
17. Massé V, Ghate RS. Using standard X-ray images to create 3D digital bone models and patient-matched guides for aiding implant positioning and sizing in total knee arthroplasty. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon) 2021;26(1):31-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2021.1894239
18. Lustig S, Fleury C, Goy D, Neyret P, Donell ST. The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted
system and its implication for knee arthroplasty. Knee 2011;18(1):15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2009.12.010
19. Parratte S, Price AJ, Jeys LM, Jackson WF, Clarke HD. Accuracy of a new robotically assisted technique for total
knee arthroplasty: A cadaveric study. J Arthroplasty 2019;34(11):2799-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.040
20. Seidenstein A, Birmingham M, Foran J, Ogden S. Better accuracy and reproducibility of a new robotically-assisted system for total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a cadaveric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021;29(3):859-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06038-w
arthroplasty: the patient perspective. J Arthroplasty 2019;34(6):1093-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.075
2. Palazzo C, Jourdan C, Descamps S, Nizard R, Hamadouche M, Anract P, et al. Determinants of satisfaction 1 year after total hip arthroplasty: the role of expectations fulfilment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:53.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-53
3. Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK. Meta-analysis of navigation vs
conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012;27(6):1177-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.028
4. Bollars P, Boeckxstaens A, Mievis J, Kalaai S, Schotanus MGM, Janssen D. Preliminary experience with an imagefree handheld robot for total knee arthroplasty: 77 cases compared with a matched control group. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2020;30(4):723-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02624-3
5. Liow MHL, Xia Z, Wong MK, Tay KJ, Yeo SJ, Chin PL. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores
the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised study. J Arthroplasty 2014;29(12):2373-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.010
6. Smith AF, Eccles CJ, Bhimani SJ, Denehy KM, Bhimani RB, Smith LS, et al. Improved patient satisfaction
following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2021;34(7):730-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700837
7. Figueroa F, Wakelin E, Twiggs J, Fritsch B. Comparison between navigated reported position and postoperative
computed tomography to evaluate accuracy in a robotic navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Knee
2019;26(4):869-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.05.004
8. Hampp EL, Chughtai M, Scholl LY, Sodhi N, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Jacofsky DJ, et al. Robotic-arm assisted total
knee arthroplasty demonstrated greater accuracy and precision to plan compared with manual techniques. J Knee Surg 2019;32(3):239-50. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1641729
9. Mullaji A, Kanna R, Marawar S, Kohli A, Sharma A. Comparison of limb and component alignment using
computer-assisted navigation versus image intensifier-guided conventional total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, single-surgeon study of 467 knees. J Arthroplasty 2007;22(7):953-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.030
10. Bautista M, Manrique J, Hozack WJ. Robotics in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2019;32(7):600-6.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1681053
11. Sires JD, Craik JD, Wilson CJ. Accuracy of bone resection in MAKO total knee robotic-assisted surgery. J Knee
Surg 2021;34(7):745-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700570
12. Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Anis HK, Ehiorobo J, Newman JM, Taylor K, et al. One-year patient outcomes for roboticarm-assisted versus manual total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2019;32(11):1063-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1683977
13. Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is
associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with
conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 2018;100-B(7):930-7.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1449.R1
14. Biant LC, Yeoh K, Walker PM, Bruce WJM, Walsh WR. The accuracy of bone resections made during computer
navigated total knee replacement. Do we resect what the computer plans we resect? Knee 2008;15(3):238-41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2008.01.012
15. Casper M, Mitra R, Khare R, Jaramaz B, Hamlin B, McGinley B, et al. Accuracy assessment of a novel image-free handheld robot for total knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon) 2018;23(1):14-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2018.1519038
16. Batailler C, Hannouche D, Benazzo F, Parratte S. Concepts and techniques of a new robotically assisted
technique for total knee arthroplasty: the ROSA knee system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021;141(12):2049-58.
https://10.1007/s00402-021-04048-y
17. Massé V, Ghate RS. Using standard X-ray images to create 3D digital bone models and patient-matched guides for aiding implant positioning and sizing in total knee arthroplasty. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon) 2021;26(1):31-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2021.1894239
18. Lustig S, Fleury C, Goy D, Neyret P, Donell ST. The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted
system and its implication for knee arthroplasty. Knee 2011;18(1):15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2009.12.010
19. Parratte S, Price AJ, Jeys LM, Jackson WF, Clarke HD. Accuracy of a new robotically assisted technique for total
knee arthroplasty: A cadaveric study. J Arthroplasty 2019;34(11):2799-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.040
20. Seidenstein A, Birmingham M, Foran J, Ogden S. Better accuracy and reproducibility of a new robotically-assisted system for total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a cadaveric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021;29(3):859-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06038-w