Metaphyseal bone decompression of distal radius for early stages of Kienbock's disease. Minimum follow-up of 10 years.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15417/757

Keywords:

Kienbock, descompresión ósea, largo plazo, estadios tempranos. Kienböck, bone decompression, long-term results, early stages

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study is to analyze the long-term clinical and radiological results of a series of patients with early stages of the Kienbock disease treated with radius core decompression.

Methods

This retrospective study included 23 patients with Kienböck’s disease (Lichtman stage II and IIIA) who underwent distal radius metaphyseal core decompression that were followed-up for at least 10 years. At the last follow-up, the patients were evaluated for wrist range of motion and grip strength. The overall results were evaluated by the modified Mayo wrist score and visual analogue scale pain score. We also compared the radiological changes between the preoperative and final follow-up in their Lichtman classification and the modified carpal height ratio.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 13 years (range 10-18). Based on the modified Mayo Wrist Score, clinical results were excellent in 9 patients, good in 11 patients, fair in 2 and poor in one patient. The mean preoperative pain according to VAS was 7 (range 6-10) and was 1.1 (range 0-6) at the final follow-up. Compared with the opposite side, the average flexion/extension arc was 78% and the grip strength was 81%. Radiographic disease progression according to the Lichtman classification occurred in four wrists.

Conclusion

This long-term follow-up study shows that radius core decompression is a valid alternative for the treatment of the early stages of the kienbock disease.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lichtman DM, Degnan GG. Staging and its use in the determination of treatment modalities for Kienbock’s disease. Hand Clin. 1993;9(3):409-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0712(21)01262-2

Beredjiklian PK. Kienböck’s disease. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34(1):167-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.10.012

llan CH, Joshi A, Lichtman DM. Kienböck's disease: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001;9:128-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200103000-00006

Tambe AD, Trail IA, Stanley JK. Wrist fusion versus limited carpal fusion in advanced Kienböck's disease. Int Orthop. 2005;29:355-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0013-7

Afshar A, Eivaziatashbeik K. Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of radial shortening osteotomy and vascularized bone graft in Kienböck disease. J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Feb;38(2):289-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.11.016

Elhassan BT, Shin AY. Vascularized bone grafting for treatment of Kienböck's disease. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34:146-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.10.014

Illarramendi AA, Schulz C, De Carli P. The surgical treatment of Kienböck’s disease by radius and ulna metaphyseal core decompression. J Hand Surg. 2001;26A:252-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2001.22928

Fujiwara H, Oda R, Morisaki S, et al. Long-term results of vascularized bone graft for stage III Kienbock disease. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(5):904-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.02.010

Nattrass GR, King GJ, McMurtry RY, Brant RF. An alternative method for determination of the carpal height ratio. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(1):88-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199401000-00011

Stahelin A, Pfeiffer K, Sennwald G, Segmuller G. Determining carpal collapse: an improved method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71:1400–1405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198971090-00019

Illarramendi AA, De Carli P. Radius decompression for treatment of kienbock disease. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2003 Sep;7(3):110-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00130911-200309000-00007

McKay SD, MacDermid JC, Roth JH, Richards RS. Assessment of Complications of Distal Radius Fractures and Development of a Complication Checklist. J Hand Surg Am. 2001; 26: 916–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2001.26662

Martin GR, Squire D. Long-term outcomes for Kienböck’s disease. Hand (NY). 2013;8(1):23-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-012-9470-9

Luegmair M, Goehtz F, Kalb K, Cip J, van Schoonhoven J. Radial shortening osteotomy for treatment of Lichtman Stage IIIA Kienbock disease. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017 Mar; 42(3):253-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193416676723

Watanabe T, Takahara M, Tsuchida H, Yamahara S, Kikuchi N, Ogino T. Long-term follow-up of radial shortening osteotomy for Kienböck disease. J Bone Joint Surg. 2008;90A:1705-1711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00421

Arora R, Lutz M, Deml C, Krappinger D, Zimmermann R, Gabl M. Long-term subjective and radiological outcome after reconstruction of Kienböck’s disease stage 3 treated by a free vascularized iliac bone graft. J Hand Surg. 2008;33A:175-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.11.005

Sherman GM, Spath C, Harley BJ, Weiner MM, Werner FW, Palmer AK. Core decompression of the distal radius for the treatment of Kienböck’s disease: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:1478-1481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.06.011

Pountos I, Panteli M, Panagiotopoulos E, Jones E, Giannoudis PV. Can we enhance fracture vascularity: What is the evidence?. Injury 2014 Jun;45 Suppl 2:S49-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.009

Innes L, Strauch RJ. Systematic review of the treatment of Kienböck’s disease in its early and late stages. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(5):713-717, 717.e1– e4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.02.002

Blanco RH, Blanco FR. Osteotomy of the radius without shortening for Kienböck’s disease: a 10-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(11):2221-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.07.023

Published

2018-02-15

Issue

Section

Clinical Research

How to Cite

Metaphyseal bone decompression of distal radius for early stages of Kienbock’s disease. Minimum follow-up of 10 years. (2018). Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 83(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.15417/757

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4