CLINICAL RESEARCH
Impact
of Joint Space Narrowing on Functional Outcomes
After Hip Arthroscopy
Damián Arroquy,*,**
María Pía Silvestrini, **
Sergio Ruiz, *
Martín Rubado, *
Martín Botta, *
Luciano Mañero, *
Juan Manuel Barrios*
*Orthopedics and Traumatology Service,
Clínica María Auxiliadora, Olavarría, Buenos Aires,
Argentina
**School of Health Sciences,
Universidad Nacional del Centro, Olavarría, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) can often progress to hip
osteoarthritis. Although advanced
osteoarthritis is a contraindication to arthroscopy, a subgroup of patients without
advanced disease who have only mild joint
space narrowing may be
candidates for this procedure. Objectives: To evaluate and compare functional outcomes in
patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS with joint space narrowing
(Tönnis grade 1) and those with FAIS without joint
space narrowing (Tönnis grade 0). Materials and Methods:
A retrospective review included 46 hip arthroscopies
performed in 44 patients. Patients
were divided into two groups according
to the Tönnis classification: group A (grade 0) and group
B (grade 1). Functional outcomes
were assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and the activities of daily living (HOS-ADL) and sports-specific (HOS-SSS) subscales of the Hip Outcome Score. Results: Patients in group A (without joint
space narrowing) had better functional outcomes, reflected in higher
functional scores, than those in group B (with joint
space narrowing) (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: This study suggests that
joint space narrowing in patients with FAIS is associated with poorer
functional outcomes after hip arthroscopy. This
finding may be explained by the higher
prevalence of severe
chondral lesions and the difficulty of labral repair
in patients with joint
space narrowing.
Keywords: Hip arthroscopy; Tönnis classification; functional
outcomes; cam lesion.
Level
of Evidence: IV
Impacto
del estrechamiento articular en los resultados funcionales de la artroscopia de cadera
RESUMEN
Introducción: El síndrome
de fricción femoroacetabular (SFFA),
frecuentemente puede evolucionar hacia la artrosis
de cadera y, si
bien la artrosis
avanzada contraindica la artroscopia, existe
un subgrupo de pacientes que, a pesar
de no tener artrosis avanzada, muestran una leve disminución del espacio articular, lo que los convierte en candidatos para este procedimiento. Objetivos:
Evaluar y comparar
los resultados funcionales de pacientes tratados
con artroscopia de cadera por SFFA con estrechamiento del espacio articular (grado 1 de Tönnis) y pacientes con SFFA sin alteración (grado
0 de Tönnis). Materiales y Métodos: Se llevó a cabo una
revisión retrospectiva de 46 artroscopias de cadera realizadas en 44 pacientes. Se los dividió en dos grupos según la
clasificación de Tönnis: grupo
A (grado 0) y grupo B (grado 1). Los
resultados funcionales se evaluaron con el Harris
Hip Score modificado (HHSm), el Hip Outcome Score-Activity of Daily Living (HOS-ADL)
y su subescala, orientada al deporte (Sport-Specific Subscale). Resultados: Los pacientes del grupo A (sin estrechamiento del espacio articular) obtuvieron mejores resultados funcionales, reflejados en
puntajes más altos en las escalas funcionales, comparados con los del grupo B
(con estrechamiento del espacio articular) (p <0,001). Conclusiones: El estudio
sugiere que el estrechamiento del espacio articular en pacientes con SFFA
se asocia con peores resultados funcionales después de la artroscopia de cadera. Esta observación podría
explicarse por la mayor
prevalencia de lesiones condrales severas y la dificultad para reparar el labrum en pacientes con estrechamiento del espacio
articular.
Palabras clave: Artroscopia de cadera;
clasificación de Tönnis; resultados funcionales; lesión tipo CAM.
Nivel de Evidencia: IV
Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) results
from abnormal contact
between the acetabulum and femoral neck and can frequently cause labral or cartilage injury,
leading to hip osteoarthritis. Numerous studies have shown that
osteoarthritis adversely affects outcomes after hip arthroscopy. However, some
patients with FAIS have mild joint space narrowing without advanced
osteoarthritis and may be treated arthroscopically. A recent study with 20-year
follow-up after hip arthroscopy for labral tears identified chondral damage to
the femoral head and acetabulum as the most important risk factor for
conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA).1-4
Patients
with moderate or severe hip osteoarthritis, corresponding to Tönnis grades 2 and 3, have consistently had poorer
outcomes after hip arthroscopy than those with no or mild osteoarthritis. Studies of patients
with mild osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 1),
however, have not shown the same adverse effect on clinical outcomes as in patients with more advanced disease. In
a systematic review, Domb et al. found that joint space <2 mm and Tönnis grade
>1 were indicators of poor outcomes after hip arthroscopy and that THA may
be justified in these patients. Based on these studies, current hip
preservation practice has narrowed surgical indications to patients with good joint quality and preserved joint space, specifically joint space >2 mm and Tönnis grades 0 and 1.5-7 This study
aimed to evaluate
and compare functional outcomes after hip arthroscopy in patients with FAIS
and joint space narrowing (Tönnis grade 1) and those with FAIS without joint space narrowing (Tönnis grade 0).
We
conducted a retrospective, observational, comparative cohort study of hip
arthroscopies performed in patients diagnosed with FAIS.
All procedures were performed by the same surgeon.
Between
January 2016 and June 2025, 55 hip arthroscopies were performed. The analysis
included patients who underwent surgery for FAIS and had at least one year of
follow-up. Cases with advanced joint space narrowing (Tönnis
grade >1) or acetabular dysplasia were excluded. The final sample comprised
46 hip arthroscopies in 44 patients.
Indications
for arthroscopic treatment were radiographic evidence of FAIS, clinical
examination findings consistent with hip pain, and failure of conservative
treatment. Conservative measures included relative rest, activity modification, analgesics, and muscle
strengthening while avoiding
deep flexion under
load.
All patients
underwent radiography and magnetic resonance
imaging before surgery.
Pincer-type deformity was
defined as a center-edge angle >40°, and cam-type deformity as an alpha
angle >50°. Osteoarthritis was
graded according to the Tönnis classification: no
joint space narrowing (grade 0) or definite narrowing (grade 1). Joint space
was measured on weight-bearing anteroposterior hip radiographs using digital
software (AGFA). Grade 1 was defined as narrowing <50% or residual joint
space >2 mm in all regions. In total, 28 hips were classified as grade 0 and
18 as grade 1 (Figure 1).8-11
All
procedures were performed by the same surgeon under spinal anesthesia combined
with a pericapsular block. Patients were positioned supine, with traction
applied using a central post. Anterolateral and anterior portals were routinely
used. An interportal capsulotomy was first performed
using a banana knife. In patients with acetabular overcoverage (pincer
morphology), a controlled acetabuloplasty was performed; in some cases,
this was limited
to creating a bleeding bone bed to promote labral
repair.
Labral tears were repaired
using 2.8-mm knotless
PEEK anchors. Chondral
lesions were graded according
to the Outerbridge classification.
After work in the central
compartment was completed, traction was released to assess the femoral head–neck
junction. In patients with cam-type deformity, osteochondroplasty
was performed using a burr under fluoroscopic guidance.
All
patients were discharged on the day of surgery and instructed to maintain
partial weight-bearing for three weeks. Physical therapy began in the third
week, focusing first on restoring range of motion and then on muscle strengthening.
The
following variables were recorded: age, sex, deformity type, osteoarthritis
grade (Tönnis), chondral lesions (Outerbridge), labral repair, and whether microfracture was performed. Functional outcomes were
assessed at the final follow-up using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living
subscale (HOS-ADL), and its Sport-Specific
Subscale (HOS-SSS). These instruments were administered in person, by
telephone, or by email. Failure was defined as an HHS <70 or radiographic
progression of osteoarthritis warranting THA. Advanced chondral
lesions and the need for microfracture were also assessed
as potential predictors of
failure.1,12
Descriptive
statistics were used to characterize the sample. Between-group comparisons of
means were performed using Student’s t-test or Welch’s t-test, with ANOVA or the Kruskal–Wallis
test used as appropriate according to whether the assumptions were met.
Categorical variables were compared using the ² test or Fisher’s exact test,
as appropriate.
To
explore predictors of functional outcomes, multiple linear regression models
were fitted with postoperative mHHS as the dependent
variable. Covariates included age, sex, Tönnis grade,
deformity type, chondral lesion grade, and HOS-ADL scores.
Kaplan–Meier
curves were constructed to estimate failure-free survival, and the Tönnis groups
were compared using the log-rank test. The small number of events (n = 2)
precluded reliable estimation of a multivariable Cox regression model. A
p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Analyses
were performed using R version 4.5.0 (2025-04-11 ucrt;
R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The dplyr, ggplot2, and tidyr
packages were used for data management and visualization; stats for comparisons of means and categorical associations; survival and survminer for survival analyses
and Kaplan–Meier curves; and
broom for tabular presentation of the regression models.
The study included 46 patients (25 men and 21 women),
with a mean age of 33.9 ± 9.4 years (range 18-52) and
a mean follow-up of 45.7 months (range 12-96).
According to the Tönnis classification, 28
patients (60.9%) had grade 0 and 18 (39.1%)
had grade 1 osteoarthritis. There were 17 cam, 20 mixed,
and 9 pincer deformities. Intra-operative chondral lesions were classified as grade 0 (n = 17), grade
1 (n = 1), grade
2 (n = 9), grade
3 (n = 8), and grade 4 (n = 11) (Table 1).
Overall
functional outcomes were favorable. The mean postoperative mHHS
was 86.5 (median 87; range 59–91), the mean HOS-ADL was 84.9 (median 88.5), and
the mean HOS-SSS was 83.9 (median 87) (Figure 2).
When
age was compared by Tönnis grade, patients with mild
osteoarthritis (grade 1) were significantly older than those with grade 0 (39.6 ± 8.1 vs. 30.2 ± 9.7 years; p = 0.001).
Patients with grade 0 also had higher functional
scores: mHHS, 89.1 ± 2.5 vs. 82.3 ± 9.8 (p = 0.010); HOS-ADL,
91.9 ± 5.0 vs. 74.0 ± 10.5 (p <0.001); and HOS-SSS,
91.2 ± 5.5 vs. 72.3 ± 10.0 (p <0.001) (Table 2).
Confidence
intervals and effect sizes confirmed the clinical relevance of these
differences. The mHHS
showed a large effect size (Cohen’s d 1.05; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]
0.42-1.68), whereas the HOS-ADL (Cohen’s d 2.34; 95% CI 1.57–3.10) and HOS-SSS
(Cohen’s d 2.49; 95% CI 1.69-3.27) showed very large effect sizes. These
findings reinforce that patients without osteoarthritis achieve substantially
greater functional benefits (Table 3).
In contrast,
postoperative mHHS did not differ significantly among deformity types
(ANOVA p = 0.152; Kruskal–Wallis p = 0.114) (Figure 3).
Chondral
lesions were strongly associated with osteoarthritis grade. Advanced chondral
lesions (grades 3-4) were more frequent
in patients with Tönnis grade 1, and this difference was statistically significant (Fisher’s exact
test, p <0.001) (Figure 4, Table 4).
Deformity type, however, was not significantly associated with Tönnis grade (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.126).
In the
multivariable linear regression analysis, no individual variable was
significantly and independently associated with postoperative mHHS.
The overall model explained 48% of the variability in outcomes (adjusted
R2 = 0.48; p <0.001) (Table 5).
An expanded
model that included
sex and HOS scores slightly
improved the fit, yielding an adjusted R2 of 0.53 (p <0.001). No individual
covariate showed clear statistical significance. However, the interaction
between Tönnis grade
and HOS-ADL showed
a statistical trend
(p = 0.075), suggesting that radiographic severity
may modify the effect of
performance in activities of daily living on postoperative mHHS
(Table 6).
Finally,
survival analysis (event = mHHS <70) showed
failure-free survival of 100% in the Tönnis grade 0
group and 88.9% in the grade 1 group at 65 months of follow-up. The
Kaplan-Meier curves showed a trend toward lower survival in patients with grade
1, but the log-rank test did not reach statistical significance, probably
because of the small number of events (n = 2) (Table
7, Figure 5).
This
study compared the characteristics and functional outcomes of patients with
FAIS who underwent hip arthroscopy, divided into two groups according to the
degree of joint space narrowing (Tönnis
classification). Patients without preoperative joint space narrowing (group A,
grade 0) achieved better functional outcomes, measured using the mHHS, than those with narrowing (group B, grade 1). The
predominant deformity type also differed between groups. Mixed, cam, and pincer
deformities were more evenly distributed in group A, whereas cam-type deformity clearly predominated in group B.
These
findings agree with the literature suggesting that osteoarthritis, even in its
early stages manifested as joint space narrowing, may adversely affect outcomes
after hip arthroscopy. Joint space narrowing has been associated with greater chondral
damage and poorer hip function,
which may explain
the lower functional scores in
group B. The higher prevalence of chondral lesions in this group (100% vs. 26%)
further supports this observation and suggests that joint space narrowing may
indicate greater intra-articular damage. Our findings are consistent with those of Domb et al. in showing that
patients with Tönnis grade 1 can achieve
statistically significant improvements in functional outcomes. However, the
clinical relevance of these improvements remains uncertain: Nho et al. reported
that patients with grade 1 osteoarthritic changes are less likely to achieve a
minimally satisfactory outcome than those with grade 0.5,6,11,13-15
The
causal relationship between FAIS and hip osteoarthritis is well described, but
whether correcting cam or pincer morphology prevents osteoarthritis progression
remains debated. In a study assessing hips before and after cam resection, Van
Houcke et al. found that peak contact forces were
significantly elevated in patients with cam-type FAIS but returned to normal
after resection. This suggests that cam resection may prevent further chondral
injury. In our study, the observed difference in the distribution of bony
deformities was not significantly associated with Tönnis
grade. Failure-free survival at 65 months was 100% in the Tönnis
grade 0 group and 88.9% in the grade 1 group. Vilaseca et al. reported a THA
conversion rate of 2.43% in patients followed
for more than 10 years.4,13,16
Several
limitations should be considered. The sample size, particularly in group B, may
limit the statistical power to detect subtle differences. Longer-term follow-up would also help assess osteoarthritis progression and the need for THA. Despite these limitations, the
study provides valuable information on the relationship between joint space
narrowing, deformity type, and functional outcomes after hip arthroscopy.
These
findings suggest that patients with joint space narrowing should be selected
cautiously for hip arthroscopy. Although arthroscopy may relieve symptoms in
some cases, patients with Tönnis grade 1 may face a higher risk of suboptimal functional
outcomes and more rapid osteoarthritis progression. A thorough preoperative
assessment, including careful evaluation of joint space and bony deformity, is
therefore essential to counsel patients about their expectations and consider
alternative treatments, such as THA, in selected cases.
1. Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Carlisle JC, Patterson DC. Joint space
predicts THA after
hip arthroscopy in patients 50 years and older. Clin Orthop Relat
Res 2013;471(8):2492-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2779-4
2. Larson
C, Russell Giveans M, Taylor M. Does arthroscopic FAI correction improve
function with radiographic arthritis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:1667-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1741-6
3. Arroquy D,
Pérez Alamino L, Orlowski B, Catán A, Chahla JA, Vilaseca T. Satisfacción y retorno deportivo luego
de tratamiento artroscópico del síndrome
de fricción femoroacetabular. Artroscopia (Buenos
Aires) 2021;28(2):112-7. Available at: https://revistarelart.com/index.php/revista/article/view/117
4. Vilaseca T, Cao S. Artroscopia de cadera para síndrome de fricción femoroacetabular: Reportes
funcionales a diez años. Artroscopia (Buenos Aires) 2024;31(3):85-90. Available
at: https://revistarelart.com/index.php/revista/article/view/348
5. Domb
BG, Gui C, Lodhia P. How much arthritis is too much for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review.
Arthroscopy 2015;31(3):520-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.008
6. Domb BG, Chaharbakhshi
EO, Rybalko D, Close MR, Litrenta J, Perets. Outcomes of hiparthroscopic
surgery in patients with Tönnis grade 1 osteoarthritis at a minimum
5-year follow-up: a matched-pair comparison with a Tönnis grade 0 control group. Am J Sports Med 2017;45(10):2294-2302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517706957
7. Oakley SP, Portek
I, Szomor Z, Appleyard RC, Ghosh P,
Kirkham BW, et al. Arthroscopy – a
potential “gold standard” for the diagnosis of the chondropathy of early osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage
2005;13(5):368-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2004.12.005
8. Duncan
ST, Khazzam MS, Burnham JM, Spindler KP, Dunn WR, Wright RW. Sensitivity of standing radiographs to detect knee arthritis: a
systematic review of Level I studies. Arthroscopy
2015;31(2):321-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.08.023
9. McClincy MP, Lebrun DG, Tepolt FA, Kim Y-J, Yen Y-M, Kocher
MS. Clinical and radiographic predictors of acetabular cartilage lesions
in adolescents undergoing hip arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 2018;46(13):3082-9.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518801848
10. Byrd
JWT, Jones KS, Bardowski EA. Influence of Tönnis grade on outcomes of arthroscopy for FAI in athletes: a comparative analysis. J Hip Preserv Surg 2018;5(2):162-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hny01
11. Nho SJ, Beck EC, Nwachukwu BU, Cvetanovich GL, Neal WH,
Harris JD, et al. Survivorship and outcome of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome
performed with modern surgical techniques. Am J Sports Med 2019;47(7):1662-9.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546519843936
12. Chandrasekaran S, Gui C, Darwish N, Lodhia P, Suarez-Ahedo C, Domb BG. Outcomes of hip arthroscopic surgery in patients with Tönnis grade
1 osteoarthritis with a minimum 2-year follow-up: evaluation using a
matched-pair analysis with a control group with Tönnis
grade 0. Am J Sports Med 2016;44(7):1781-8.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516638087
13. Van Houcke J, Khanduja
V, Audenaert EA. Accurate arthroscopic cam resection normalizes contact stresses in patients with femoroacetabular
impingement. Am J Sports Med 2021;49(1):42-8.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520974378
14. Fenn
TW, Kaplan DJ, Brusalis CM, Chapman RS, Larson
JH, Nho SJ. Functional outcome scores and conversion to total hip arthroplasty after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome
in patients with Tönnis grade 1 versus grade 0 arthritis. Am J Sports Med 2024;52(1):34-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465231210958
15. Lin DCM, Reichmann
WM, Gossec L, Losina E, Conaghan
PG, Maillefert JF. Validity and responsiveness of radiographic joint space width metric measurement in hip osteoarthritis: a systematic
review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011;19(5):543-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2010.12.014
16. Kraeutler MJ, Garabekyan T, Goodrich
JA, Fioravanti MJ, Chadayammuri V, Mei-Dan
O. Standardizing the prearthritic
hip joint space width: An analysis of 994 hips. Arthroscopy 2018;34(7):2114-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.02.036
M. P. Silvestrini ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7649-2318
S. Ruiz ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1147-2200
M. Rubado ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5729-5490
M. Botta ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5858-4115
L. Mañero ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2102-5798
J. M. Barrios ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1235-9788
Received on June 28th, 2026. Accepted after
evaluation on August
10th, 2026 • Dr. DAMIÁN ARROQUY
• damianarroquy@hotmail.com • https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1045-7840
How to cite this article: Arroquy D, Silvestrini MP, Ruiz S, Rubado
M, Botta M, Mañero L, et al. Impact
of Joint Space
Narrowing on Functional Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy. Rev Asoc Argent
Ortop Traumatol 2026;91(5):438-447.
https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2026.91.5.2422
Article
Info
Identification:
https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2026.91.5.2422
Published: October, 2026
Conflict
of interests: The authors
declare no conflicts
of interest.
Copyright: © 2026, Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia y
Traumatología.
License: This article is under Attribution-NonCommertial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Creative Commons License
(CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0).